View Single Post
Old 30-01-2007, 02:05 AM   #3 (permalink) Top
Swansen
The Ninj

 
Swansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 22 Male
Posts: 1,669
Times Helpful: 36
My Mood: Busy
Status: Offline

My Computer

yeah, at the time it looked good, i'll go back over it, but in my defense, you really don't want anything higher than 8ms, reason being is if you find a monitor that has certain specs and has 12ms for response time, and you will more than likely be able to find a monitor that has the same or better specs at the same price only with 8ms. Also, response time is getting better all the time and it isn't really a price issue anymore, i bought my monitor like a year ago and it has 3ms for response time for a around $300. Now i can find a monitor that has way better specs and maybe a little worse or the same response time for half that price. So what i'm saying is if you really want to compete with a CRT then 8ms is about as high as you want to go.

__________________
Times inadvertently confused people in threads: 4812485 times
Quote:
Originally Posted by megamaced View Post
"Welcome to another of Swansen's random thoughts. Guaranteed to confuse the best of us, or your money back!"
LCD, CRT and general computer display info / Real_Ultimate_Power ---- FOLDING FOR THE GOOD OF MANKIND :F@H Team 38417

Send a message via AIM to Swansen Send a message via Yahoo to Swansen   Reply With Quote