Hardware Forums - View Single Post

ProcalX · 13-03-2005, 10:25 AM

1GB @ 133MHz compared to 768MB @ 175MHz

The 768MB would be "faster", as having [i]more[/] memory does not increase speeds.. just means you have [i]more[/] memory.

Ninja, i really hope your NOT using memory dividers, because unless you're overclocking your CPU by a good 400MHz you won't see a performance increase but a decrease.

And i presume that your memory is PC2100? (133MHz=DDR266) by default, or is it PC2700 (166MHz=DDR266)?

13-03-2005, 10:25 AM	#4 (permalink) Top
ProcalX Student Bum Join Date: Nov 2003 Age: 22 Male Posts: 1,536 Times Helpful: 30 My Mood: Cheerful Status: Offline My Computer	1GB @ 133MHz compared to 768MB @ 175MHz The 768MB would be "faster", as having [i]more[/] memory does not increase speeds.. just means you have [i]more[/] memory. Ninja, i really hope your NOT using memory dividers, because unless you're overclocking your CPU by a good 400MHz you won't see a performance increase but a decrease. And i presume that your memory is PC2100? (133MHz=DDR266) by default, or is it PC2700 (166MHz=DDR266)? __________________ Laptop // Toshiba Satellite A210-11P // AMD Turion 64 X2 1.8Ghz Dual Core // 4GB DDR2 // 200GB Sata HD // Dual Layer DVD-RW // ATI Radeon HD2400XT 256MB // 15.4" HD Crystal Display // Vista Premium Desktop // HP DC7700* // Pentium Dual Core 3.4Ghz // 2GB DDR2 // 2x 160GB Sata2 // 16x DVD-RW // Crucial Ballistix // ATI Radeon X1950GT 512MB // 20" Dell Screen // XP Pro SP2*