Go Back   Hardware Forums > Tech Support Forum > Benchmarking

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 22-07-2004, 02:42 AM   #136 (permalink) Top
Big Geek
 
extreme4377's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 223
Status: Offline
thanks Big

Send a message via AIM to extreme4377 Send a message via Yahoo to extreme4377   Reply With Quote
Old 23-07-2004, 09:36 AM   #137 (permalink) Top
Student Bum
 
ProcalX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Age: 22 Male
Posts: 1,536
Times Helpful: 30
My Mood: Cheerful
Status: Offline

My Computer

well i am VERY pleased with my new card.. with everything at stock on my computer i am getting 15,667 333mhz fsb 1.83ghz barton e.t.c..

not bad eh? i'll do a 3dmark03 test soon..
__________________
Laptop // Toshiba Satellite A210-11P // AMD Turion 64 X2 1.8Ghz Dual Core // 4GB DDR2 // 200GB Sata HD // Dual Layer DVD-RW // ATI Radeon HD2400XT 256MB // 15.4" HD Crystal Display // Vista Premium

Desktop // HP DC7700 // Pentium Dual Core 3.4Ghz // 2GB DDR2 // 2x 160GB Sata2 // 16x DVD-RW // Crucial Ballistix // ATI Radeon X1950GT 512MB // 20" Dell Screen // XP Pro SP2
Send a message via MSN to ProcalX   Reply With Quote
Old 23-07-2004, 10:52 AM   #138 (permalink) Top
Supreme Geek
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Age: 27
Posts: 1,638
Times Helpful: 16
My Mood: Sick
Status: Offline

My Computer

Excellent

I think you're Doom 3 ready
  Reply With Quote
Old 23-07-2004, 11:02 AM   #139 (permalink) Top
Student Bum
 
ProcalX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Age: 22 Male
Posts: 1,536
Times Helpful: 30
My Mood: Cheerful
Status: Offline

My Computer

i won't overclock it (my card) until hl2 comes out.. then ill do some clocking :
__________________
Laptop // Toshiba Satellite A210-11P // AMD Turion 64 X2 1.8Ghz Dual Core // 4GB DDR2 // 200GB Sata HD // Dual Layer DVD-RW // ATI Radeon HD2400XT 256MB // 15.4" HD Crystal Display // Vista Premium

Desktop // HP DC7700 // Pentium Dual Core 3.4Ghz // 2GB DDR2 // 2x 160GB Sata2 // 16x DVD-RW // Crucial Ballistix // ATI Radeon X1950GT 512MB // 20" Dell Screen // XP Pro SP2
Send a message via MSN to ProcalX   Reply With Quote
Old 31-07-2004, 06:33 AM   #140 (permalink) Top
I'm a thugged out gangsta
 
ninja fetus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Age: 19 Male
Posts: 3,525
Times Helpful: 70
Status: Offline

My Computer

I got 10615 on a 2600 barton, saphire radeon 9600se 128mb, and 284mb ddr pc2100.
not too bad?
Send a message via AIM to ninja fetus Send a message via Yahoo to ninja fetus   Reply With Quote
Old 31-07-2004, 06:55 AM   #141 (permalink) Top
Big Geek
 
extreme4377's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 223
Status: Offline
284mb? you mean 384? or 256?
Send a message via AIM to extreme4377 Send a message via Yahoo to extreme4377   Reply With Quote
Old 31-07-2004, 06:56 AM   #142 (permalink) Top
I'm a thugged out gangsta
 
ninja fetus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Age: 19 Male
Posts: 3,525
Times Helpful: 70
Status: Offline

My Computer

oops sorry yeah 384
Send a message via AIM to ninja fetus Send a message via Yahoo to ninja fetus   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2004, 07:45 PM   #143 (permalink) Top
Alpha Geek
 
Waffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Age: 20 Male
Posts: 2,270
Times Helpful: 51
My Mood: Angelic
Status: Offline

My Computer

ok first time benchmarker here - literally first attempt. at 1024x768 with 2x aa, i got 11094. Is this good or bad and should I do it on the default browser settings?

I'm gonna do it on 1600x1200 and everything maxed now, so i'll let you know. on my old pc, p3 800mhz, 384 ram mx440 64mb, i got 4678. so it's a massive improvement, i'll give ya that.
Send a message via MSN to Waffle   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2004, 08:30 PM   #144 (permalink) Top
HWF Godfather
 
Big B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Age: 28 Male
Posts: 9,673
Times Helpful: 585
My Mood: Devilish
Status: Offline

My Computer

Run it with the default settings. Should be 1024x768 @ 32-bit color, no AA or AF.
Send a message via AIM to Big B Send a message via Yahoo to Big B   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2004, 08:53 PM   #145 (permalink) Top
Alpha Geek
 
Waffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Age: 20 Male
Posts: 2,270
Times Helpful: 51
My Mood: Angelic
Status: Offline

My Computer

i'm using the second edition, and the "benchmark" button with 17 tests. hopefully thats right. my score is 11330.

Dragothic Low - 200.9 fps, high - 117 fps
Nature 49 fps
Environ. Bump Map - 136.6 fps

Good or bad?
Send a message via MSN to Waffle   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2004, 12:55 AM   #146 (permalink) Top
Nonconformist Geek
 
Anti-Trend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Age: 27 Male
Posts: 4,903
Times Helpful: 539
Status: Offline

My Computer

The human eye ceases to notice additional frames at an exponential rate after 50FPS, so I'd say that's pretty good
Send a message via ICQ to Anti-Trend Send a message via AIM to Anti-Trend   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2004, 05:27 PM   #147 (permalink) Top
Alpha Geek
 
Waffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Age: 20 Male
Posts: 2,270
Times Helpful: 51
My Mood: Angelic
Status: Offline

My Computer

all good then? thanks guys!
Send a message via MSN to Waffle   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2004, 06:34 PM   #148 (permalink) Top
Administrator
 
Sniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Age: 25 Male
Posts: 4,503
Times Helpful: 121
My Mood: Bored
Status: Offline

My Computer

Waffle what settings are you using? I'm sure you can get better marks! I think people mostly do the benchmark with the first three test on the list...
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2004, 07:16 PM   #149 (permalink) Top
Alpha Geek
 
Waffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Age: 20 Male
Posts: 2,270
Times Helpful: 51
My Mood: Angelic
Status: Offline

My Computer

im using the defaults, like b said.

what sort of scores are you getting?

i thought it seemed a little low, but seeing as first time benchmark, didn't mean a lot to me.

hell, it plays far cry on max everything and high aa, even at 1600x1200, so i don't think there's a problem.

the low score made me think that there might be a problem with the settings or something.
Send a message via MSN to Waffle   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2004, 07:47 PM   #150 (permalink) Top
HWF Godfather
 
Big B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Age: 28 Male
Posts: 9,673
Times Helpful: 585
My Mood: Devilish
Status: Offline

My Computer

They do seem a bit low. My P4 2.4B @ 3.1GHz with a GF4 Ti4600 is doing 14,500+. 3D Mark can give a lower score if your AGP or Chipset driver isn't installed.
Send a message via AIM to Big B Send a message via Yahoo to Big B   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
6600GT 3DMark2001 Matt555 Benchmarking 4 31-10-2005 04:56 PM
Low 3DMark2001 SE Score spuff Video Cards, Displays and TV Tuners 5 04-08-2004 01:07 PM
Very poor 3DMark2001 score ... why??? spuff Video Cards, Displays and TV Tuners 17 30-03-2004 01:28 PM
3DMark2001 SE Problem spuff Benchmarking 2 17-02-2004 10:30 PM
my scores... Plain_Simple Benchmarking 1 16-02-2004 12:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:29 AM.


Copyright © 2000 - 2008 · HARDWAREFORUMS.COM · All rights reserved