6600GT 3DMark2001

Matt555 · 31-10-2005, 04:01 PM

Some scores from 3DMark2001 with my XFX 6600GT AGP8x 128MB
Scores before that were
Core: 500MHz (stock)
Memory: 1000MHz (stock)
9,437
Core: 580MHz
Memory: 1150MHz
9,870
Core: 600MHz
Memory: 1200MHz
10,101

Addis · 31-10-2005, 04:35 PM

Pretty even scaling for overclocks. I would have thought it would have been a bit more CPU bound.

Matt555 · 31-10-2005, 04:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Addis

Pretty even scaling for overclocks. I would have thought it would have been a bit more CPU bound.

What do you mean by "I would have tought it would have been a bit more CPU bound" sorry if it's something easy, never heard that 'phrase' before.

Addis · 31-10-2005, 04:53 PM

I just thought that for a pretty old benchmarking tool, the Celeron would have been more of a bottleneck but the even scaling shows not. Maybe its just that 3dmark01 tests the graphics card intensely more.

Matt555 · 31-10-2005, 04:56 PM

yeah I know it's an old program, I may get a new one soon, but I'm not too bothered about benchmarks, I just thought I'd do it and let people know my results. Yeah my Celeron is a bit of a bottleneck I think, I may get higher scores with a P4 and some DDR400 RAM (my RAM doesnt even run at 333MHz because of my CPU FBS)

31-10-2005, 04:01 PM	#1 (permalink) Top
Matt555 iMod Join Date: May 2005 Age: 21 Male Posts: 3,844 Times Helpful: 238 My Mood: Happy Status: Offline My Computer	6600GT 3DMark2001 Some scores from 3DMark2001 with my XFX 6600GT AGP8x 128MB Scores before that were Core: 500MHz (stock) Memory: 1000MHz (stock) 9,437 Core: 580MHz Memory: 1150MHz 9,870 Core: 600MHz Memory: 1200MHz 10,101 __________________

31-10-2005, 04:35 PM	#2 (permalink) Top
Addis The King Join Date: Jan 2004 Age: 18 Male Posts: 5,254 Times Helpful: 402 My Mood: Drunk Status: Offline My Computer	Pretty even scaling for overclocks. I would have thought it would have been a bit more CPU bound. __________________ Never trust a program you don't have the source code for. My website \| Powerful Desktop Linux \| Linux for human beings \| Linux for power users \| Linux for ricers

31-10-2005, 04:53 PM	#4 (permalink) Top
Addis The King Join Date: Jan 2004 Age: 18 Male Posts: 5,254 Times Helpful: 402 My Mood: Drunk Status: Offline My Computer	I just thought that for a pretty old benchmarking tool, the Celeron would have been more of a bottleneck but the even scaling shows not. Maybe its just that 3dmark01 tests the graphics card intensely more. __________________ Never trust a program you don't have the source code for. My website \| Powerful Desktop Linux \| Linux for human beings \| Linux for power users \| Linux for ricers

31-10-2005, 04:56 PM	#5 (permalink) Top
Matt555 iMod Join Date: May 2005 Age: 21 Male Posts: 3,844 Times Helpful: 238 My Mood: Happy Status: Offline My Computer	yeah I know it's an old program, I may get a new one soon, but I'm not too bothered about benchmarks, I just thought I'd do it and let people know my results. Yeah my Celeron is a bit of a bottleneck I think, I may get higher scores with a P4 and some DDR400 RAM (my RAM doesnt even run at 333MHz because of my CPU FBS) __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
3DMark2001 Scores	Big B	Benchmarking	224	14-09-2005 05:50 PM
6600gt oc	dtheman	Video Cards, Displays and TV Tuners	4	16-05-2005 01:25 AM
Low 3DMark2001 SE Score	spuff	Video Cards, Displays and TV Tuners	5	04-08-2004 02:07 PM
Very poor 3DMark2001 score ... why???	spuff	Video Cards, Displays and TV Tuners	17	30-03-2004 02:28 PM
3DMark2001 SE Problem	spuff	Benchmarking	2	17-02-2004 10:30 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)