|
|
#1 (permalink) Top |
|
Big Geek
![]() |
well ive done 3dmark 03 at 800x600 and got a score of 5095. ive only got ddr2 512mb 533mhz ram and hope to get a higher result with corsair 1024mb 800mhz ram (when it arrives)
__________________
AMD Athlon 64 3800+ AM2 DFI INFINITY ultra m2 MOBO 1024 ddr2 800mhz Ram WD 250GB sata 2 16mb Cache HD Antec Neo He 500watt Sli Ready |
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) Top |
|
HWF Godfather
![]() Join Date: Dec 2001
Age: 27 Male
Posts: 9,553
Times Helpful: 585
My Mood: Devilish
Status: Offline
|
3DMark is more of a graphical test, and the faster speed RAM won't help unless you're overclocking. However, the additional amount may play a role in a higher score. Typically, people use the default settings, which use a 1024x768 resolution. I do in the 8600-8800 range with 3DMark 03 defaults on my main box.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) Top | |
|
Big Geek
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
AMD Athlon 64 3800+ AM2 DFI INFINITY ultra m2 MOBO 1024 ddr2 800mhz Ram WD 250GB sata 2 16mb Cache HD Antec Neo He 500watt Sli Ready |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) Top |
|
out of date
![]() Join Date: May 2003
Age: 26
Posts: 1,620
Times Helpful: 104
My Mood: Twisted
Status: Offline
|
I was looking at 512mb card on ebay the other day but after reading a review it was kinda obvious that the 512mb is just marketing. They recommended a 256mb card with a better gpu.
Also I upgraded from 512mb to 1024mb a couple of weeks ago and saw little improvement. But maybe my old graphics was working at full pelt with just 512mb ram and wont scale further even when I overclock the fsb. |
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) Top |
|
HWF Godfather
![]() Join Date: Dec 2001
Age: 27 Male
Posts: 9,553
Times Helpful: 585
My Mood: Devilish
Status: Offline
|
RAM size on a video card is a very poor way to measure performance. A 256MB GeForce 6200 is going to get wasted by a 128MB GeForce 6600GT. The quantity of RAM is going to do more for smoother performance than the speed. You can use DDR2-800, but unless your system is using the faster speed, you won't see anything from the higher speed. It's only going to operate at a set frequency in conjunction with your FSB. You will see an improvement (depending on what you play and at what settings) by going to 1GB from 512MB, but that's contigent on the system making use of the extra RAM. If you're still playing Half-Life and not FEAR, you're highly unlikely to notice much of a difference---if any at all. This, assumes of course, that you have a decent video card to play the game with. You can have 32GB of DDR2-1066 RAM and a GeForce 2 MX and guess what? FEAR will still run like crap, and it's not because of the amount of RAM. The video card isn't able to process that heavy of textures due to the lack of pipelines to do it with.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 3dmark05 scores | Temporal | Benchmarking | 78 | 11-04-2008 06:51 PM |
| Low 3d Mark 03 scores | Girtho961 | Benchmarking | 7 | 11-10-2005 09:05 PM |
| Get Ready for 3DMark 2005 | Big B | News and Article Comments | 0 | 29-09-2004 08:49 PM |
| my scores... | Plain_Simple | Benchmarking | 1 | 16-02-2004 12:24 PM |
| MADONION.COM™ RELEASES 3DMark®2001 SECOND EDITION | syngod | Benchmarking | 0 | 12-02-2002 09:31 PM |