i think it could be with watercooling and bumping up the voltage.
Hey guys could you check out this thread and tell me what you think? The guy said he overclocked a PII to a 1.6ghz? i dont think that is a possible
http://www.caraudioforum.com/vbb3/sh...d.php?t=229926
Never trust a program you don't have the source code for.![]()
My website | Powerful Desktop Linux | Linux for human beings | Linux for power users | Linux for ricers
Doesnt seem likely.... he says he used air cooling (doubt it) and he hasnt posted any pics of this overclock.
There's alot of crap on the internet (i would say 80% of the facts on the internet are not facts)
Dear intel,Already Made My Decision
Never trust a computer you can't repair yourself.
Windows Vista - Viruses Intruders Spyware Trojans Adware
Why Linux is Better!|Pastafairianism|Say no to National ID|Firefox Extensions Guide
scientology has been getting alot of attention recently
When the rich wage war, it is the poor who die.
Where are the WMD's that our governments used to justify the war?
No. Even with extreme cooling methods, there's a limitation on how fast that CPU could go. The man is claiming a 300% overclock. There is no reliable evidence that any Pentium II could go that high. 50% overclocks are considered to be on the high-end of the OC percentages. I'd give him some credit if he said something like 700MHz. While that's still out of the range of most OC's, that could be a reasonable OC.Originally Posted by curtis20
That guy is talking pure bullshit. Find a reputable person that has OC'd a Pentium II, not III, to that level of an OC. You can't. He hasn't.
The pure fact is willhub, that ancient ruin of a CPU could NEVER go that high, it just can't be done!
Adopt an unanswered thread. | Who's Online | vB Code
Some people are alive only because it’s illegal to kill them!
Support bacteria, it's the only culture some people have!
Impossible. The L2 Cache on the P2 was already slower than the CPU's clock speed. He'd have to disable both the L1 cache and the L2 cache to get anywhere near the claimed overclock, and even then I'm sure it's not true. Do know how much volatage he'd need for that junk? Even if it was possible, we're talking liquid nitrogen and a custom voltage regulator. But the fact remains that it's simply not possible with a freaking .25 micron process!
He's claiming nearly 1.2GHz. That's nearly a 300% increase over stock...and he's claiming he's done it on air. To be honest, the motherboard he's stated to have, the Asus P2B-F, would have to have a selectable FSB of up to around 400MHz. Motherboards back then did not have that high of an FSB. Could he play with the multiplier? Only downward...and given that wouldn't helped him, that would've been a stupid move.Originally Posted by willhub
As AT already mentioned, the manufacuturing process of .25 micron is incapable of that speed. If Intel could've gotten the PII to 1.6GHz, why did they need to change the design that much and go to the 0.18, 0.13, and the current 0.09 micron process to hit today's speeds?
While I know some people can hit some nice OC's with extreme cooling, the fact is, it'd be very difficult to get anywhere close to what that guy is claiming. The Pentium II only went up to 450MHz due to their design. Yes, someone with a 3.x P4 has likely hit 6GHz, but the design of the Pentium 4 allowed it to scale extremely well. The Pentium II is nothing like the Pentium 4, save some basic architecture (x86).
If anyone here actually read the whole 8 pages of that thread (like i did when i was bored), he got cought out at the end using a Celeron 1.4Ghz with a Powerleap adapter!
Adopt an unanswered thread. | Who's Online | vB Code
Some people are alive only because it’s illegal to kill them!
Support bacteria, it's the only culture some people have!
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks