Pro or Game card?????

mikp11 · 05-02-2004, 03:59 PM

I am building a new computer to be used for 3D graphic. I will mainly use Max, photoshop, Coreldraw and combustion on it.

I have done quite a lot of looking into this and so far have only confused myself further. Firstly my budget is only £330 pounds so there is no way I am looking at any top end pro cards. They are just way too expensive.

I have heard that ATI driver can cause many problems with pro graphics apps. Is this true?

The only pro cards I can afford are the very bottom of the range ones ie. quadro FX500. These are similar in price to the top end game cards. Will these low end pro cards really out perform a top end game cards?

Any help would be much appreciated

cheers

mik

Big B · 05-02-2004, 03:15 PM

In the past, ATi's drivers were craptacular at best, but they have come a long way. I've not had problems using Photoshop with my Radeon 8500. As for 3DS max, I'm not quite sure. You might see what 3DLabs has in your price range as they target pro graphics stuff, but that still may be pretty pricey. If you want to do some gaming as well as graphics, I'd definitely go with ATi. If it's graphics only, 3DLabs or Matrox would be your cup of tea.

mikp11 · 05-02-2004, 04:56 PM

Cool thanks a lot for your reply. I'll have a look at those two places. It's mainly graphic I want it for but I might play some games. Are pro cards really that bad for games? Is that a directX thing?

Big B · 05-02-2004, 06:16 PM

No, but they're geared more toward professional apps first and foremost, especially Matrox and 3DLabs. ATi and nVidia change a few things on their mainstream cards for pro use and then jack the price up. Direct X has nothing to do with that. The Quadro FX and FireGL cards from nVidia and ATi have DX8 hardware (well DX9 for ATi, nVidia messed up their implementation of DX9). If you're wanting to play Doom 3 and the like at a decent resolution, then I would stay away from Matrox and 3DLabs since they don't cater to the gaming crew anymore (unless you wanna fork over for the Parhelia, which the gaming performance is equal to a GeForce 3).

05-02-2004, 03:59 PM	#1 (permalink) Top
mikp11 Geek Trainee Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 2 Status: Offline	Pro or Game card????? I am building a new computer to be used for 3D graphic. I will mainly use Max, photoshop, Coreldraw and combustion on it. I have done quite a lot of looking into this and so far have only confused myself further. Firstly my budget is only £330 pounds so there is no way I am looking at any top end pro cards. They are just way too expensive. I have heard that ATI driver can cause many problems with pro graphics apps. Is this true? The only pro cards I can afford are the very bottom of the range ones ie. quadro FX500. These are similar in price to the top end game cards. Will these low end pro cards really out perform a top end game cards? Any help would be much appreciated cheers mik

05-02-2004, 03:15 PM	#2 (permalink) Top
Big B HWF Godfather Join Date: Dec 2001 Age: 28 Male Posts: 9,640 Times Helpful: 585 My Mood: Devilish Status: Offline My Computer	In the past, ATi's drivers were craptacular at best, but they have come a long way. I've not had problems using Photoshop with my Radeon 8500. As for 3DS max, I'm not quite sure. You might see what 3DLabs has in your price range as they target pro graphics stuff, but that still may be pretty pricey. If you want to do some gaming as well as graphics, I'd definitely go with ATi. If it's graphics only, 3DLabs or Matrox would be your cup of tea. __________________ Hardware Forums\|HWF Rules\|My DVD's\|PSU FAQ\|HWF Folding Team\|2CPU

05-02-2004, 06:16 PM	#4 (permalink) Top
Big B HWF Godfather Join Date: Dec 2001 Age: 28 Male Posts: 9,640 Times Helpful: 585 My Mood: Devilish Status: Offline My Computer	No, but they're geared more toward professional apps first and foremost, especially Matrox and 3DLabs. ATi and nVidia change a few things on their mainstream cards for pro use and then jack the price up. Direct X has nothing to do with that. The Quadro FX and FireGL cards from nVidia and ATi have DX8 hardware (well DX9 for ATi, nVidia messed up their implementation of DX9). If you're wanting to play Doom 3 and the like at a decent resolution, then I would stay away from Matrox and 3DLabs since they don't cater to the gaming crew anymore (unless you wanna fork over for the Parhelia, which the gaming performance is equal to a GeForce 3). __________________ Hardware Forums\|HWF Rules\|My DVD's\|PSU FAQ\|HWF Folding Team\|2CPU

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
game controls	matttibb	PC Gaming	6	20-01-2005 06:36 PM
weird game	ninja fetus	PC Gaming	7	26-12-2004 07:12 PM
Game Key needed	Mack	PC Gaming	11	29-09-2004 03:18 PM
sound card/video card conflict	lytalbayre	General Hardware	7	11-10-2002 11:42 PM
Game Idea's for a LAN?	SETEO	PC Gaming	7	15-12-2001 10:11 AM

05-02-2004, 04:56 PM	#3 (permalink) Top
mikp11 Geek Trainee Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 2 Status: Offline	Cool thanks a lot for your reply. I'll have a look at those two places. It's mainly graphic I want it for but I might play some games. Are pro cards really that bad for games? Is that a directX thing?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)