Which temperature monitor is reliable?

Discussion in 'Overclocking & Cooling' started by Meddi, May 31, 2009.

  1. Meddi

    Meddi Geek Trainee

    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Hi, I have a weird issue thats probably common among all you PC users but here goes. I have Speedfan loaded up and my CPU temperature is 37C reported by the motherboard and 29C in a thing called Core.

    When I fire up a game the motherboard will report 45C and the core will report 37C or around that area. So which one has the correct temperature reading? Or is it two different spots they read from? I mean the surface and core of the CPU.

    Thanks in advanced.

    AMD64 3200+ by the way, old stuff but still kicking :)

    [​IMG]
     
  2. Big B

    Big B HWF Godfather

    Likes Received:
    145
    Trophy Points:
    63
    If you want reliable software temps, then good luck. Speedfan is pretty good, as well as CoreTemp (for Intel Core 2-based CPUs and up) are good software monitors, but if you want accuracy, you'll need to look to a hardware-based monitor. From what [H]ard|OCP has said in their heatsink reviews, Intel seems to use a probe after drilling out part of the heatspreader on the CPU packaging. (I don't know the exact procedure, but it's out there.)
     

Share This Page