[COLOR=“DarkGreen”]Use the first combination. Actually the two clock speeds not make much different. But on the first combination you have higher memory. And also you have same cache on both system, not much effective.
[COLOR=“DarkGreen”]Well I don’t see a huge different between those two, different reasons are there to select it.
When we comes to the core, first one use the Conroe and I think it s better than the Kentsfield, because as far as I know it use the dual-dies to implement it.
If you check the cache memory, the second one best for me. Because there L2 has 2x4MB. Make sense to me.
If you can use the second main board with 4GB memory. But little expensive. If you can even done it later go for the second.
[COLOR=“DarkGreen”]Yes you can use it on vista 64-bit OS. But I think it is better if you can use 4GB memory. Normally vista need high memory to give the maximum performance.
It got the best reviews in Computer Shopper (UK) this month
If you’re serious about overclocking your PC and you want some memory that’s up to the job, this kit from Crucial is ideal. We had it running stably at 55 per cent faster than its rated speed. Only OCZ’s kit could go as high, and that costs twice as much. The RAM also gained consistently good benchmark scores. If you want to push your PC as far as you can, this is the overclocking RAM to get.
It’s a Best Buy. 5/5