Hi,
Right now I currently have one 60GB Corsair Force GT SATAIII SSD hooked up to one of my SATAIII ports on my Asus Sabertooth X58 MoBo, and one conventional WD Caviar black HD hooked up to the normal Intel-controlled SATA 3Gbps ports. Unfortunately, like most X58 chipset boards, the SATAIII ports are controlled by that horrendously bad Marvell 9128 controller. I plan on getting a second one of these SSDs in the near future and RAID0-ing it with my current SSD.
Here’s my question though: would hooking up these SSDs to the Intel 3Gbps ports and RAID0-ing them actually be the wiser choice, or should I stick with the Marvell ports? I’ve heard that the Marvell controller is really unreliable with RAID, and I’ve also heard that the Marvell controller lacks some technologies most SSDs are built for these days, such as TRIM. I also have to consider the speed I’d be getting. In the case of two SATAIII SSDs in RAID0, do you think that the Marvell 6Gbps ports would actually outperform the Intel 3Gbps ports much? I’ve heard that Marvell-controlled SATAIII ports aren’t true SATAIII, they’re just SATA ports tied to a PCIe x1 lane, instead of true ports tied to the southbridge chipset.
So there’s my question: considering I have two SATAIII SSDs in RAID0, which would be faster\more reliable in my case: using the Intel SATAII 3Gbps ports, or the Marvell SATAIII 6Gbps ports?
Simek