Raptors are good, there is a 74GB version, but i presonally wouldnt buy one unless i had lots of money, i’d rather buy a HDD with a larger amount of storage on it but thats personal choice.
With the Caviar and Barracuda drives, I’d tend to go towards the Seagate drives. They are quieter usually, and good reliability. i’m not saying the Caviars aren’t but its my choce.
[QUOTE=Addis]
With the Caviar and Barracuda drives, I’d tend to go towards the Seagate drives. They are quieter usually, and good reliability. i’m not saying the Caviars aren’t but its my choce.
[/QUOTE]
I was originally going to go for Seagate anyway, but WD caught my eye.
Still I’d rather go with a brand named after a fish, rather than the eggs of one
The Raptor runs at 10,000RPM, and is the only SATA hard drive line to do so. WD does not have a SCSI division any more, so they can have an ATA drive with that spindle speed. As an enterprise drive, the drive is more robust in tolerances, like SCSI drives are, which adds to the cost. These aren’t meant to be cheap drives, nor should they, given the intended market.
yeah raptors are more directed at the enthusiast who craves their system to be as fast as is physically possible, for the average-high end user a 7200 RPM drive is sufficient, if you want a bit more speed put 2 in a RAID-0 configuration