Well, not technically a benchmark but it's all I've got on this computer right now. Ok, here it is: 1024x768 Model Detail: High AA: 4x Texture Detail: High AF: 8x Water Detail: Reflect all Shader Detail: High Shadow Detail: High V-Sync: Off, duh. --54.7 FPS I was fairly pleased with that so I upped my settings to: 1152x864 AA: 6x AF: 16x --53.9 FPS Ok not much change, I'll go all the way: 1280x960 --52.9 So I only lost around 1 FPS each time I upped my settings. I was pretty happy with these scores so I left it. Just for the fun of it I took my resolution and settings down as far as they would go. Here is the result: --59.4 FPS That I found surprising, not much change. Well I'm happy with my framerates. What do you guys think. All my harware is listed in the "My Computer" thing.
Damn Ninja, thats pretty impressive. I'm downloading 3DMark '05 right now, and I'll post overclocked scores when I get around to that.
It's probably the drivers. I'm using some outdated omega drivers and have my 9600XT at 540core/720memory Also I've tweaked winXP tons. I'm sure I could get even better FPS under win2kpro
Yea, I would probably do a lot better with the latest Catalyst drivers. But they were making me get unrecognized devces. I wonder if that has any negative effects. I'm going to try going back to 5.7 and see what I get.
on 3Dmark05 I had an average of 25 on the first, 12 on the second, and 20 on the last my cpu was 3/2/4 haha
pretty good for one video card, i was running it on the free version only lets you play 1024x768 with no AF or AA, graphics are awesome 287megs (whistles)
