has anyone seen this film, I dont think it was released in the USA? anyway what did you think of the film?
Yeah, it was released in the US. It's coming to video pretty soon. [mod hat off] We're being pummeled with political propoganda enough as it is, (there's a ton of band's doing anti-Bush concerts) for starters. Secondly, if his are like his books, Michael Moore isn't looking to expose the truth so much as twist and manipulate it to reflect his position---which is beyond liberal, IMO. Questioning authority is one thing, but I personally feel that he goes to the level of slander. Much, if not all of Farenheit 911 has been disproven by the 9/11 commission to boot. People have their opinions, but I'm getting just so sick and tired of hearing how much Bush sucks. Now, I'm not saying I'm fawning over him myself, but there's just so much hostility I about want to vote Bush out of spite. I for one will be very happy once November 2 has come and gone.
Well, since we're on topic here, you guys should check this out! I'm not a Bush or a Kerry supporter (I vote Independant), but this s**t poses some questions that beg for answers...
yeh I had seen similar pics saying that there was no plane! if there was, there would be something left behind! nice link Anti!
Yeah sniper... a boeing disappering after it crashes..odd.. and no scorching of the grass forehand, in fact no damage to the lawn at all..
My conspiracy senses are tingling! Think about the ramifications... why would our own government do something like that? What happened to the actual 747, including all passengers aboard? If that event was engineered, what about the twin towers?
I told that to my mom and asked the same thing! where did the actual plane go?! probably some unknown location, and they used the pentagon as a cover up to say that the plane crashed into it. Just my thought
The FBI probably snatched it up... Yes there was such a plane, my aunt was on it i think, i cant remember which one but it was either the one that crashed in pennsylvania or the spposedly pentagon one Or do you mean, there might have been no plane that crashed into the pentagon which there probably wasnt, but a missile instead
Nader...ehhh, he's kinda out there. Actually, I think Libertarian Michael Badnarik is about the best guy for the job, mainly because he strongly advocates slimming down the government (which Bush has done the opposite, and based on Kerry's record--he'd do it too), and getting out of peoples lives. There should always be some sort of government, but ours, like many governments has meddled in peoples lives, and ignored the Constitution. www.lp.org One thing that they are for is tighter border security. Also, they want to stop sending money to other nations, especially those that just sit there and don't produce anything...basically an entire country on welfare.
It's awesome that you're even considering these things, B. Most people only take in the predigested rubbish they get from TV. I say, vote your conscience, screw the majority! -AT
I looked at who the Democrats put up, and to me, it just comes down to the fact they're mad that Bush is in office. Not because of who he is, but because he's a Republican. The thing they're arguing about is their military service. That's their hot issue. I do not like John Kerry as a man, nor in any other capacity. Bush, he's a nice guy, just like Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter. I don't think he has a mean bone in his body. But, there's enough things he's not done, that are glaring issues. He's more of a moderate, IMO, and sometimes lacks the guts like Cheney does (except for the ol ticker . I think he's worked to do his job, but I just don't agree with what's been done. He's a man I respect, however. I'd like to say the same about Kerry, but the guy is a self-centered twit who just wants to be in the Oval Office, not actually do anything. Except blame those evil republicans and the vast right-wing conspiray. When I actually thought about the issues across the board, the most logical arguments came from the libertarian party. That and they are for less government, but not the absence of it (we do need some), and they look at the Consitution as the base. Not this hodgepodge crap instituted by judges (who are only supposed to INTERPERT it).
