Greetings to all.
Could someone shed some light on this please:
Pc:
Asus Pundit P1-AH1 (barebone)
nforce 430 chipset
integrated GF 6150 graphics controler (1xDVI, 1xVGA, 1xtv-out)
other info: cpu athlon 64 3ghz, 1gb ram, oses: linux and win xp.
I wish to connect two monitors to it, both working at 1680x1050 (Philips 200W6CS/00). Obviously one monitor would connect to the dvi port and second would connect to the vga port. This pc is used solely for office work (office apps, net browsing etc).
Questions:
1. Would the graphics card be able to drive the monitors at their native resolutions?
2. If the answer to the above is yes, then would there be much of a difference in the quality of the display between the two?
3. Is it a good idea in general to use the setup as described above or should I consider a system with a graphics card that has two DVI ports?
Also consider that there is no option of upgrading the graphics controler on this pc.
Thanking you in advance, karjola.
Could someone shed some light on this please:
Pc:
Asus Pundit P1-AH1 (barebone)
nforce 430 chipset
integrated GF 6150 graphics controler (1xDVI, 1xVGA, 1xtv-out)
other info: cpu athlon 64 3ghz, 1gb ram, oses: linux and win xp.
I wish to connect two monitors to it, both working at 1680x1050 (Philips 200W6CS/00). Obviously one monitor would connect to the dvi port and second would connect to the vga port. This pc is used solely for office work (office apps, net browsing etc).
Questions:
1. Would the graphics card be able to drive the monitors at their native resolutions?
2. If the answer to the above is yes, then would there be much of a difference in the quality of the display between the two?
3. Is it a good idea in general to use the setup as described above or should I consider a system with a graphics card that has two DVI ports?
Also consider that there is no option of upgrading the graphics controler on this pc.
Thanking you in advance, karjola.