not bad for an 1600pro , although the x1600pro can almost beat cards like the X800XL and xt in modern games i belive.
10351 CPU-AMD X2 2.2 4200+ GPU's- 7600 gt oc SLI Mem 2gb corsair value mem mobo- gigabyte Nforce 4 K8N ultra SLI
i think he thinks it's fake becouse of the stuff around the numbers, when thats just becouse of compression and Jpeg format.
No that's not why, it's either fake or just plain sad. Either way it's not worth anyone's time to look at. Burn your computer right now.
what a stupid thing to say, look at the thread title (3dmark05 scores) he is just sharing what he got, saying its not worth anyone's time to look at, then your practically saying it about the whole damnd thread, what do you expect a FX5200 to get, 5million? heh, you computer aint much better, burn your rig right now. I happen to have though it was quite funny tbh, and other people will have too.
if u cant say anything good bout anyone else hard earned rigs, den stop saying sh*t bout dem. no need to be JEALOUS. nd anyway y wud sum1 want to fake their results by making them LOW. its understandable by sumone faking them by making them higher but not lower, he's scores aints fake like u
hi i just ran a 3d mark 05 score tests n this system: 400064 sandiago 7800gtx 3500 golden sample.. 2 gigs of corsair xms raptor 36gb no overclocking as yet. score 8190. is this score normal for no overclocking? & could i get more from this system with clocking the cpu a bit more?
Just tested my new rig. Scored 6040. CPU: AMD X2 3800+ Motherboard: ASUS M2V RAM: 512MB DDR2 GPU: BFGtech 7600 GT OC PCIE
8189 on my main box Video card (PNY GeForce 7900GS) is overclocked to 551MHz core, 1.34GHz RAM. CPU (A64 3700+) is OC'd to 2.42GHz
I get about half that in 3DMark 06...but 06 is more or less a rehash of 05 with the system demands jacked up.
That's killer B, a 3700+ is really temping now, they're only $80 for a skt 939 model. Can't beat that.